Sunday, February 16, 2020

Why did Communism collapse so suddenly in 1991 Explain your answer Essay

Why did Communism collapse so suddenly in 1991 Explain your answer - Essay Example Communism seeks to establish a classless society for all. It endeavors to erase all differences of class and creed and bring all the citizens at the same forefront with the government leading them all. However, the communist theory has failed miserably in the past. It is believed that the communist theory includes some connotations that are bound to fail. Capitalists mock the communist theory by saying that if there will always be the poor then there will always be the rich. There would be classification and divisions with the dos and donts, and any effort to create a society that does not have classes, this side of heaven, mainly by means of the aggressive and godless means of Communism, is bound to lead towards frustration and failure1. Before moving on to discussing why this theory failed so miserably and what was inherently wrong with the idea of having a classless state with absolute government power, one needs to know what lead to this concept. The concept of communism belongs to the Marxist school of thought. Since the late 19th century the ideas of socialism were quite popular among the working class citizens around the world and they began to show their true color when in the early 20th century several countries formed their own Communist parties. While the ruling classes reprimanded the concept of communism or socialism since it brought their power at stake, it was very much appreciated by the working class. In the interwar period, however, since different classes began to fight for or against communism, its image tarnished. It wasn’t all good and now everyone knew that. The socialist activists stepped up their campaigns against their oppressor regimes and resorted to violence to achieve their goals2 . These ruthless activities, instead of promoting communism amongst the masses, lead to previously pro-communist populace to lose their interest in the movement. Therefore the number of those who favored communism

Sunday, February 2, 2020

Summay of articals Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Summay of articals - Essay Example s is necessary, but very few companies have been able to compete on the basis of operational effectiveness due to the ease of rival companies imitating management techniques and the more that rivals begin to look like one another. As a result, there is no competition and prices are static or declining. Competitive strategy is about being different from competing businesses and companies. It requires purposely picking a different set of activities to offer a unique mix of value. The majority of managers claim that their strategies are based on the needs and interests of their customers. Everything becomes based on the customer. Many businesses, such as furniture stores, movie stores, and airlines provide services that are uniquely aligned with the needs of its customers. The fundamental quality of strategy is in the activities, such as opting to execute activities differently or execute different activities compared to those of rivals. Even if a business or company picks a unique position, they are still not guaranteed a sustainable advantage. A valuable position will only attract imitation from rivals; airlines are proof of this. As such, trade-offs are used to make strategic positions more sustainable, which can also prevent companies from becoming imitators. When a trade-off is made, more of one thing necessitates less of another. There are three reasons why a company may decide to execute trade-offs and they are as follows: inconsistencies in image or reputation, activities themselves, and from limits on internal coordination and control. Trade-offs are essential to competition and strategy, and they prompt a need for choice and purposefully limit what a company has to offer. The nature of strategy is to choose what not to do. Operational effectiveness is about reaching excellence in regard to individual activities, but strategy is about combining activities. The greatest aspect of strategy involves considering a whole system of activities and not just a